py-gpt vs hope-agent: automation for Claude compared
data as of 2026-08-23
3.3k
combined stars
468
combined forks
20
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
py-gpt has more GitHub stars (1.9k vs 1.4k).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
py-gpt
★ 1.9kactive
Desktop AI Assistant powered by GPT-5, GPT-4, o1, o3, Gemini, Claude, Ollama, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Grok, Bielik, chat, vision, voice, RAG, image and video g…
claudeaiai-assistantartificial-intelligenceautonomous-agent
view full listing →
hope-agent
★ 1.4kactive
🦭跨端交接、越用越懂你的桌面 AI 助手——也能服务化常驻、跑在云上 | Desktop AI that hands off across your devices and gets to know you better — also runs headless on a NAS or in the cloud
claudeagentaiai-assistantanthropic
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | py-gpt | hope-agent |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 1.9k | 1.4k |
| Forks | 334 | 134 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | active | active |
| Last updated | 2 months ago | 2 months ago |
| Language | Python | Rust |
| License | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | cli, api, desktop, web, mobile | api, desktop, web |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 14 | 6 |
// related comparisons
More: all automation for Claude compared · the automation for Claude category
Own py-gpt or hope-agent?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.