Everywhere vs py-gpt: automation for Claude compared
data as of 2026-08-23
8.1k
combined stars
722
combined forks
16
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
Everywhere has more GitHub stars (6.2k vs 1.9k).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
Everywhere
★ 6.2kactive
On-screen aware AI assistant for your desktop. Uses current app context, multiple LLMs, and MCP tools to help you act across apps.
claudeaiai-agentsai-assistantavalonia
view full listing →
py-gpt
★ 1.9kactive
Desktop AI Assistant powered by GPT-5, GPT-4, o1, o3, Gemini, Claude, Ollama, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Grok, Bielik, chat, vision, voice, RAG, image and video g…
claudeaiai-assistantartificial-intelligenceautonomous-agent
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | Everywhere | py-gpt |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 6.2k | 1.9k |
| Forks | 388 | 334 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | active | active |
| Last updated | 2 months ago | 2 months ago |
| Language | C# | Python |
| License | NOASSERTION | NOASSERTION |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | cli, api, desktop, web | cli, api, desktop, web, mobile |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 2 | 14 |
// related comparisons
More: all automation for Claude compared · the automation for Claude category
Own Everywhere or py-gpt?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.