gptme vs hope-agent: automation for Claude compared
data as of 2026-10-07
6.1k
combined stars
603
combined forks
33
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
gptme has more GitHub stars (4.4k vs 1.7k).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
gptme
★ 4.4kactive
Your agent in your terminal, equipped with local tools: writes code, uses the terminal, browses the web. Make your own persistent autonomous agent on top!
claudeagentagentsai-agentsai-assistant
view full listing →
hope-agent
★ 1.7kactive
🦭跨端交接、越用越懂你的桌面 AI 助手——也能服务化常驻、跑在云上 | Desktop AI that hands off across your devices and gets to know you better — also runs headless on a NAS or in the cloud
claudeagentaiai-assistantanthropic
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | gptme | hope-agent |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 4.4k | 1.7k |
| Forks | 446 | 157 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | active | active |
| Last updated | 4 months ago | 4 months ago |
| Language | Python | Rust |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | cli, api, desktop, web | api, desktop, web |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 27 | 6 |
// related comparisons
More: all automation for Claude compared · the automation for Claude category
Own gptme or hope-agent?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.