browser-use vs browser-harness: automation for Claude compared
data as of 2026-10-07
135k
combined stars
15k
combined forks
29
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
browser-use has more GitHub stars (117k vs 18k).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
browser-use
★ 117kactive
🌐 Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.
claudeai-agentsai-toolsbrowser-automationbrowser-use
view full listing →browser-harness
★ 18kactive
Browser Harness | Self-healing harness that enables LLMs to complete any task.
claudeai-agentbrowser-agentbrowser-automationbrowser-use
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | browser-use | browser-harness |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 117k | 18k |
| Forks | 13k | 1.8k |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | active | active |
| Last updated | 4 months ago | 4 months ago |
| Language | Python | Python |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | cli, api, web | api, web |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 9 | 20 |
// related comparisons
More: all automation for Claude compared · the automation for Claude category
Own browser-use or browser-harness?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.