browser-use vs stealth-browser-mcp: automation for Claude compared
data as of 2026-10-07
119k
combined stars
13k
combined forks
12
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
browser-use has more GitHub stars (117k vs 2.2k).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
browser-use
★ 117kactive
🌐 Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.
claudeai-agentsai-toolsbrowser-automationbrowser-use
view full listing →
stealth-browser-mcp
★ 2.2kactive
The only browser automation that bypasses anti-bot systems. AI writes network hooks, clones UIs pixel-perfect via simple chat.
claudeai-agent-toolsai-toolsanthropicanti-bot-bypass
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | browser-use | stealth-browser-mcp |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 117k | 2.2k |
| Forks | 13k | 296 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | active | active |
| Last updated | 4 months ago | 4 months ago |
| Language | Python | Python |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | cli, api, web | cli, api, desktop, web |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 9 | 3 |
// related comparisons
More: all automation for Claude compared · the automation for Claude category
Own browser-use or stealth-browser-mcp?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.