agentpet vs clawd-conduit: automation for Claude compared
data as of 2026-10-05
551
combined stars
73
combined forks
3
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
agentpet has more GitHub stars (371 vs 180).
clawd-conduit was updated more recently (25 days ago vs 3 months ago).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
agentpet
★ 371active
A desktop pet for macOS & Windows that monitors your AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini...) in real time, and grows as you code, feed it to…
claudeai-agentsclaude-codecodexdesktop-pet
view full listing →
clawd-conduit
★ 180active
Full-lifecycle wiring between Claude Code and the Clawd on Desk pet — all 15 hook events, with permission prompts answered straight from the desktop
claudeai-agentsclaude-codedesktop-petdeveloper-tools
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | agentpet | clawd-conduit |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 371 | 180 |
| Forks | 63 | 10 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | active | active |
| Last updated | 3 months ago | 25 days ago |
| Language | Swift | Shell |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | cli, api, desktop, web | cli, api, desktop |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 3 | 0 |
More: all automation for Claude compared · the automation for Claude category
Own agentpet or clawd-conduit?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.