claudeers.

🔓 unclaimed — this page was auto-generated from GitHub. Are you the creator?

Claim this page →
// RAG & Knowledge

OmniGlyph

Cut your Claude bill 59–70% by rendering bulky LLM context as dense PNG pages — 100% read accuracy, exact per-provider billing math (Anthropic/OpenAI/Gemini)…

// RAG & Knowledge[ cli ][ api ][ claude ]#claude#anthropic#claude-code#compression#context-window#gemini#llm#omniroute#ragMIT$open-sourceupdated about 2 hours ago
// install
git clone https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniGlyph
A real render: system prompt + tool docs packed into one dense 1568×728 page

🖼️ OmniGlyph — Context as Image

Cut your Claude bill by 59–70% by rendering bulky context as dense PNG pages — the same content, in a fraction of the tokens.

Models bill text per token, but bill an image by its dimensions — not by how much text is inside it.


Part of the OmniRoute family · 🌐 All languages

🇺🇸🇸🇦🇦🇿🇧🇬🇧🇩🇨🇿🇩🇰🇩🇪🇪🇸🇮🇷🇫🇮🇫🇷🇮🇳🇮🇱
🇮🇳🇭🇺🇮🇩🇮🇹🇯🇵🇰🇷🇮🇳🇲🇾🇳🇱🇳🇴🇵🇭🇵🇱🇵🇹🇧🇷
🇷🇴🇷🇺🇸🇰🇸🇪🇰🇪🇮🇳🇮🇳🇹🇭🇹🇷🇺🇦🇵🇰🇻🇳🇨🇳🇹🇼

📊 The numbers — measured, not estimated

metricresultreceipt
End-to-end bill reduction59–70%production trace, 13,709 requests
Tokens per converted block10× fewer (28,080 chars: 14,040 → 1,460 tokens)billing sweep
Billing-formula accuracyresidual zero across 22 count_tokens probes, 2 models × 2 tiersbenchmarks/billing-sweep/results/
Exact-read accuracy, production config30/30 (100%) on Claude Fable 5density frontier
Silent confabulations in ~300 read probes0 — every miss abstains as ILEGIVELbenchmarks/density-frontier/results/

Model scorecard (can it read dense renders? n=30 per arm, deterministic scoring):

modelreadingverdict
Claude Fable 5100% exact✅ production target
Claude Opus 4.877–87% at 4× glyph size⚠️ opt-in safe mode (savings drop to ~2×)
GPT-5.50/60 — and inflates its answers ~40× trying❌ blocked by the gate, with proof
Gemini 2.5-flash0/26 — and confabulates instead of abstaining❌ blocked (partial test, quota-limited)

The advantage is Fable-specific today — other vision encoders don't resolve dense glyphs yet. The benchmark harness re-tests any new model in one command.

🤔 Why OmniGlyph?

Every long-running agent session drags the same dead weight on every request: the system prompt, tool docs, and old history — re-billed per token, every turn. OmniGlyph is a local proxy that rewrites those bulky parts into dense PNG pages before they leave your machine:

  • Exact billing math, not heuristics — it computes the provider's real image-token formula (measured to residual zero) and converts only when the math wins.
  • Fail-closed by design — models that can't read dense renders are blocked by a gate, with benchmark receipts. No silent quality loss.
  • Private & local-first — the rewrite happens on 127.0.0.1; nothing extra is sent anywhere.
  • Reproducible — every number above has a receipt in benchmarks/*/results/, re-runnable in one command.

⚡ Quick Start

npx omniglyph                                     # proxy on 127.0.0.1:47821
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=http://127.0.0.1:47821 claude  # point Claude Code at it

Quickstart: start the proxy, check the dashboard, point Claude Code at it

Works both ways:

  • API key (pay per token): your bill drops 59–70% end-to-end.
  • Subscription session: you don't pay less, but usage limits are counted in tokens — so your limits stretch ~2–3×.

Dashboard at http://127.0.0.1:47821/: tokens saved, every text→image conversion side by side, kill switch, live model chips. Responses stream normally — only the request is compressed, never the model's output.

🖥️ The dashboard

A full local dashboard ships inside the package — offline, single-file, zero external requests. Six pages, updated live over SSE as requests flow:

Overview: mission-control KPI cards, savings sparkline and live event feed

  • Overview — mission control: savings %, $ saved, latency p95, cache hits, errors, live feed.
  • Live Flow — the pipeline as a node graph: client → gate → renderer / passthrough → API, with a particle per real request.
  • Telemetry — a token/$ odometer and a live request timeline; click any request to see exactly which parts became images and read the source text behind every page.
  • Benchmarks — the harness receipts rendered from benchmarks/*/results/, one row per model·config experiment, and run the benchmarks from the UI: $0 dry-runs stream their output live; live runs stay gated behind your API key plus an explicit cost confirmation.
  • Sessions / History — top sessions by tokens saved and every event on disk.
Live FlowBenchmarks
The request pipeline as a live node graphBenchmark receipts and in-UI dry-runs

Telemetry: odometer and live request timeline

⚙️ How it works

bulky request block ──► profitability gate ──► reflow + render (1-bit 5×8 atlas)
                       (exact billing math)     ──► 1568×728 PNG pages ──► splice back, cache-friendly
  • Billing is computed exactly, before converting: Anthropic bills ⌈w/28⌉ × ⌈h/28⌉ + 4 tokens per image (28 px patches — measured to residual zero). A full page carries 28,080 chars for 1,460 tokens ≈ 19 chars/token, vs ~2 chars/token for dense text. The gate converts only when the math wins.
  • What converts: the static system prompt + tool docs, old collapsed history, large tool outputs.
  • What never converts: your messages, recent turns, the model's output, sparse prose, byte-exact values (hashes/IDs ride alongside as text), and any model that failed the reading benchmark.

📚 Library use (no proxy)

Everything the proxy does per request is also a documented, importable API:

import { renderTextToImages, transformAnthropicMessages } from "omniglyph";

// Render any text to dense 1-bit PNG pages
const { pages } = await renderTextToImages(bigToolOutput, { reflow: true });
// pages[i].png: Uint8Array · pages[i].width × pages[i].height

// Or run the full request transform yourself — gate, billing math and all
const { body, applied, reason } = await transformAnthropicMessages({
  body: requestBytes,           // the raw /v1/messages JSON body
  model: "claude-fable-5",
});

options.keepSharp(block) pins blocks as text; options.emitRecoverable returns the originals of imaged blocks. The exact billing math ships at the package root too (anthropicImageTokens, resolveAnthropicVisionTier, openAIVisionTokens) — that is what OmniRoute consumes. Pure-JS runtime (Node and edge/Workers). Full surface: src/core/index.ts.

📤 Offline export — no proxy, no Claude Code

Not on Claude Code? Render the context to PNG pages locally and paste them into Cursor, ChatGPT, or any chat that accepts image uploads. No proxy, no API key, no account wired up:

npx omniglyph export --include "*.ts" src/   # render a folder to image pages
cat big.log | npx omniglyph export --stdin   # …or pipe any text through

You get one folder with everything to drop into the chat:

OmniGlyph-export-<hash>/
  page-001.png …   the rendered image pages — attach these
  factsheet.txt    verbatim precision tokens (paths, SHAs, ids, numbers)
  prompt.txt       a paste-ready instruction that points the model at the pages
  manifest.json    metadata + the text-vs-image token report (% saved)

--git renders your uncommitted diff, --diff <ref> a commit range, --open reveals the folder (macOS). It all runs on your machine — the export path never starts the proxy and never calls a model. Run omniglyph export --help for every flag.

🧭 The honest part

  • It is lossy. Byte-exact recall from images is unreliable by nature. Mitigations shipped: exact identifiers travel as text next to the image, and the measured production config produced zero silent confabulations — failed reads abstain.
  • Only Fable 5 is approved today, with receipts. GPT-5.5 and Gemini 2.5-flash measurably cannot read dense renders; Opus 4.8 needs 4× bigger glyphs. The gate enforces this.
  • We found and avoided a billing trap: the high-resolution image tier bills 3.3× more per page, but the vision encoder doesn't receive the extra resolution — bigger pages read worse. Measured, documented in docs/benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md, not enabled.
  • Prices change; the durable metric is the token cut, which the proxy logs per request against a free count_tokens counterfactual.

🧠 FAQ

Is the 59–70% end-to-end, or only on the requests it touched? End-to-end — the whole bill. Most compression tools report savings only on the slice they touched, which flatters the number. Our denominator is every request: the small ones the gate correctly left untouched, all cache writes and reads, and all output tokens (which the proxy never compresses). Compressed-only runs higher and is quoted separately, never as the headline.

How is the saving measured? Both sides of the same request, at the same moment. For every /v1/messages POST the proxy fires a free count_tokens probe on the original uncompressed body (the counterfactual) in parallel with the real forward, and reads the provider's actually-billed usage block off the response — both land in the same event row. Cache pricing is applied identically to both sides, so the caching discount cancels and can't be double-counted as "savings". The formula lives in src/core/baseline.ts; re-derive it from your own events log.

Why would a miss be a confabulation instead of a read error? Because model vision is not OCR: the page becomes patch embeddings, never discrete characters, so there is no per-glyph confidence to fail loudly on — when pixels underdetermine a glyph, the language prior fills the gap with something plausible. That mechanism is exactly why OmniGlyph is fail-closed about it: byte-exact values always ride as text next to the image, models that misread are blocked by the gate, and the measured production config produced zero silent confabulations in ~300 read probes — failed reads abstain.

What about byte-exact work (hashes, IDs, secrets)? Recent turns and exact identifiers stay text by design. For workloads that are all byte-exact, route them to a non-allowlisted model (e.g. a subagent on another Claude model) — anything outside the allowlist passes through byte-identical, untouched.

Didn't DeepSeek-OCR settle whether this works? It proved the channel works — with an encoder/decoder pair trained for the job. The skepticism dates from when no stock production model could read dense renders; that changed, and the model scorecard above shows exactly who reads them today, with receipts. The benchmark harness re-tests any new model in one command — the gate follows the data, not the hype.

Can I use it without Claude Code — Cursor, ChatGPT, a plain pipe? Yes, two ways. As a proxy it works with any client that lets you set the API base URL (ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, or the OpenAI base URL) — Claude Code, your own scripts, anything HTTP. And for tools that can't proxy, the Offline export above renders the context to PNG pages you paste in by hand — omniglyph export --stdin even reads straight from a Unix pipe.

How does it actually turn text into an image? It reflows the text and paints it with a 1-bit 5×8 pixel glyph atlas onto dense 1568×728 PNG pages — one bit per pixel, no anti-aliasing, so the model bills the page by its dimensions, not by how many characters are inside. How it works above has the pipeline; the benchmarks doc has the geometry and why denser isn't always cheaper.

🔬 Reproduce every number

pnpm install && pnpm test                                     # full suite
node benchmarks/billing-sweep/run.mjs --dry-run               # billing predictions, $0
pnpm exec tsx benchmarks/density-frontier/run.ts --dry-run    # cost table, $0
# with keys: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY / OPENAI_API_KEY / GEMINI_API_KEY (or --via-cli for a Claude Code subscription)

The two benchmark harnesses running in dry-run mode

Full methodology and every result table: docs/benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md. Raw per-answer receipts: benchmarks/*/results/*.jsonl.

🚀 The OmniRoute family

OmniGlyph also ships as a native compression engine inside OmniRoute — the free AI gateway. There it runs as the omniglyph engine (standalone single mode or stacked with the other engines), with fail-closed gates and image-aware token accounting.

🛠️ Tech Stack

layertech
LanguageTypeScript (strict), ESM
RuntimeNode ≥18 · Cloudflare Workers (wrangler.toml)
Renderingown 1-bit glyph atlas (Spleen/Unifont-derived, licenses in assets/) → PNG
TestsVitest — TDD, plus docs-integrity and rebrand guards
Benchmarksbenchmarks/ harnesses (billing-sweep, density-frontier) with JSONL receipts

Project layout

pathwhat
src/the proxy: transform pipeline, exact billing per provider, renderer, hosts (Node + Cloudflare Workers)
benchmarks/the harnesses that produced every number above — re-runnable
docs/BENCHMARKS · ARCHITECTURE · ROADMAP

📧 Support & Community

🙏 Acknowledgments

OmniGlyph stands on the shoulders of one project in particular — this section is our permanent thank-you.

ProjectHow it shaped OmniGlyph
pxpipe · teamchongThe discovery this whole project is built on. pxpipe proved, with receipts, that a production LLM's vision channel can carry dense textual context at a fraction of the token cost — and that the conversion must be decided per-request by exact billing math, never by vibes. The dense 1-bit rendering, the profitability gate, the count_tokens counterfactual, the fail-closed model allowlist, and the "measure before you claim" documentation culture were all pioneered there. OmniGlyph descends directly from that codebase (MIT — the original copyright line stays in our LICENSE).
Spleen · Frederic CambusThe 5×8 bitmap font family our dense 1-bit glyph atlas derives from (license in assets/).
GNU Unifont · UnifoundryCoverage for the glyphs beyond Spleen's range in the same atlas (license in assets/).

If you find OmniGlyph useful, go star the upstream too — the discovery was theirs. 🙏

📄 License

MIT — see LICENSE.

// compatibility

Platformscli, api
Operating systems
AI compatibilityclaude
LicenseMIT
Pricingopen-source
LanguageTypeScript

// faq

What is OmniGlyph?

Cut your Claude bill 59–70% by rendering bulky LLM context as dense PNG pages — 100% read accuracy, exact per-provider billing math (Anthropic/OpenAI/Gemini), fail-closed gates, measured benchmarks. CLI + proxy + Cloudflare Workers. Docs in 42 languages. Part of the OmniRoute family.. It is open-source on GitHub.

Is OmniGlyph free to use?

OmniGlyph is open-source under the MIT license, so it is free to use.

What category does OmniGlyph belong to?

OmniGlyph is listed under rag in the Claudeers registry of Claude-compatible tools.

0 views
16 stars
unclaimed
updated about 2 hours ago

// embed badge

OmniGlyph on Claudeers
[![Claudeers](https://claudeers.com/api/badge/omniglyph.svg)](https://claudeers.com/omniglyph)

// retro hit counter

OmniGlyph hit counter
[![Hits](https://claudeers.com/api/counter/omniglyph.svg)](https://claudeers.com/omniglyph)

// reviews

// guestbook

0/500

// related in RAG & Knowledge

🔓

✨ Light and Fast AI Assistant. Support: Web | iOS | MacOS | Android | Linux | Windows

// ragChatGPTNextWeb/TypeScript88,415MIT[ claude ]
🔓

Persistent Context Across Sessions for Every Agent – Captures everything your agent does during sessions, compresses it with AI, and injects relevant contex…

// ragthedotmack/JavaScript86,462Apache-2.0[ claude ]
🔓

A light-weight and powerful meta-prompting, context engineering and spec-driven development system for Claude Code by TÂCHES.

// raggsd-build/JavaScript64,711MIT[ claude ]
🔓

Compress tool outputs, logs, files, and RAG chunks before they reach the LLM. 60-95% fewer tokens, same answers. Library, proxy, MCP server.

// ragheadroomlabs-ai/Python56,255Apache-2.0[ claude ]
→ see how OmniGlyph connects across the ecosystem