
HarnessTrim
One token policy for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent and Pi. A cross-harness token-economy control plane.
Install with your AI
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any agent — it reads the repo and wires the tool into your project.
Install and set up HarnessTrim (git-clone project) into my current project. Found on https://claudeers.com/harnesstrim Repo: https://github.com/giuliastro/HarnessTrim Homepage/docs: — Detected install method: git-clone → git clone https://github.com/giuliastro/HarnessTrim Category: mcp-servers. Platforms: cli, api, mobile. Read the repo's README for exact setup and env vars, then install it and wire it into my project. Claudeers Health Verdict: active; community-verified: false. Confirm the source before running anything.
git clone https://github.com/giuliastro/HarnessTrim
// compatibility
| Platforms | cli, api, mobile |
|---|---|
| Operating systems | — |
| AI compatibility | claude |
| License | MIT |
| Pricing | open-source |
| Language | TypeScript |
HarnessTrim
One token policy for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent and Pi.
HarnessTrim is a cross-harness control plane for coding agents: a portable skill pack, thin per-harness adapters, and a reproducible benchmark suite that together cut input tokens, output tokens, and noisy tool output, instead of optimizing just one of those layers the way existing tools do.
Full design rationale and phased roadmap: see PLAN.md.
The problem
In a coding agent, tokens are spent across several channels — and most tools only attack one of them:
| Channel | What fills it | Who attacks it today |
|---|---|---|
| Tool output | test logs, git diff, grep, build output, big JSON, file reads | RTK (shell only) |
| Model output | the agent's own verbosity | Caveman |
| Thinking | reasoning tokens, billed as output | mostly nobody |
| Fixed instructions | always-loaded CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md | skills (native) |
| Conversation history | everything that survives compaction | compaction (native) |
Each existing tool moves one lever. The waste is spread across all of them, so single-lever tools leave most of the budget on the table. HarnessTrim's thesis: coordinate all five levers behind one policy, using the deterministic hook/skill primitives every modern harness already exposes.
Strategy: skill-first, adapter-second, measured
Three principles, in priority order:
- Skill-first. The portable value is a pack of Agent Skills (the format every target harness already understands). Skills carry the policy; they cost almost nothing until invoked.
- Adapter-second. Thin per-harness adapters translate one shared policy into each harness's native dialect (hooks, plugins, compaction events). Adapters are where the real work is — and where fragility lives — so they stay deliberately small and delegate all logic to the shared core.
- Measured, not asserted. Every claim is backed by a reproducible benchmark. Competitors report self-measured numbers that don't compose; HarnessTrim ships the measurement harness itself.
flowchart TB
subgraph Harnesses
CC[Claude Code]
CX[Codex]
OC[OpenCode]
HM[Hermes Agent]
PI[Pi]
end
subgraph Adapters["Adapter layer (thin, per-harness)"]
A1[hooks / plugins / compaction events]
end
subgraph Core["@harnesstrim/core (shared, deterministic)"]
R[reducers]
D[content dispatcher]
P[policy presets]
M[metrics / TrimEvent]
end
subgraph Skills["Portable skill pack"]
S[delta-response · debug-log-slim · review-delta<br/>compact-handoff · scaffold-fast · delegate-bulk]
end
CC --- A1
CX --- A1
OC --- A1
HM --- A1
PI --- A1
A1 --> Core
Core --- Skills
classDef done fill:#1f6f3f,stroke:#0d3,color:#fff;
class CC,CX,OC,HM,PI,A1,R,D,P,M,S done;
Green = has a shipped adapter. All five targets (OpenCode, Codex, Claude Code, Hermes Agent, Pi) now have one, reusing the same core and skills.
The five levers
| Lever | Mechanism | HarnessTrim component |
|---|---|---|
| Progressive disclosure | recurring instructions live in on-demand skills, not always-loaded files | skill pack + doctor |
| Tool-output reduction | a deterministic reducer slims noisy output before it reaches the model | reducers + adapter tool.execute.after |
| Thinking routing | match reasoning effort to task type (low for mechanical, high for architecture) | policy presets (advisory) |
| Subtask isolation | isolate/handoff noisy work instead of polluting the main context | compact-handoff + delegate-bulk skills, compaction hook |
| Observability | normalize what was actually saved into one schema | TrimEvent + metrics |
How tool-output reduction works
The adapter intercepts tool results, the shared core decides what (if anything) to slim, and only the signal reaches the model. Reducers are deterministic and idempotent and never touch the cacheable prompt prefix — so they shrink cost without busting the prompt cache.
sequenceDiagram
participant M as Model
participant H as Harness
participant A as HarnessTrim adapter
participant C as core.reduceAuto
M->>H: request tool call (e.g. run tests)
H->>H: execute tool (1410 chars of output)
H->>A: tool.execute.after(output)
A->>C: reduceAuto(output)
C-->>A: slimmed output + TrimEvent (124 chars)
A-->>H: mutated output.output
A->>A: append TrimEvent (telemetry, opt-in)
H-->>M: slimmed output enters context
KPIs
What HarnessTrim optimizes for, and how each is measured:
| KPI | Definition | Target | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool-output reduction | 1 − (chars out / chars in) per reduced tool call | ≥ 50% on noisy output | adapter telemetry, benchmark |
| Signal fidelity (recall) | must-keep signal lines surviving reduction / total must-keep | 100% (bench fails otherwise) | Tier A benchmark (measured now) |
| Blended session reduction | total tokens saved / baseline session tokens | 30–50% (model) | end-to-end benchmark (Tier B, planned) |
| Quality retention | task-success parity vs the untrimmed baseline | 100% (no regressions) | Tier B benchmark |
| Cache preservation | share of reductions that leave the cacheable prefix untouched | 100% | design guarantee (reducers only touch volatile output) |
| Coverage | share of noisy tool calls that a reducer actually matched | grow over time | telemetry (reducer: null = missed) |
| Overhead | added latency / tokens from the stack itself | negligible | reducers run locally, no tokenizer in-process |
Savings: measured vs hypothesized
Two honesty tiers. Keep them separate.
Measured (real numbers today)
The token number alone is not the point — a reducer that drops the one line you needed would post a
great percentage and ruin the context. So the benchmark measures both: token reduction and
signal fidelity — of the lines that must survive (the error, the failing test, the assertion, the
changed files, the summary), how many are kept. It also audits any dropped line that looks like
signal. Headline: −65% tokens at 100% signal recall across the seed fixtures (pnpm run bench,
no LLM). The bench fails loudly if signal recall drops below 100% or a signal-looking line is dropped.
| Fixture | Reducer | Tokens | Reduction | Signal kept |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| jest, mostly-pass | test-output-slim | 408 → 216 | −47.1% | 6/6 |
| pytest, mostly-pass | test-output-slim | 395 → 211 | −46.6% | 5/5 |
| lockfile-heavy diff | git-diff-slim | 939 → 183 | −80.5% | 4/4 |
| Overall | 1742 → 610 | −65% | 15/15 (100%) |
Each fixture's must-keep lines are annotated in benchmarks/src/run.ts, so
"what survives" is explicit and reproducible, not a claim.
- One live OpenCode session: a real
bashtest run was reduced 1410 → 124 chars (−91.2%) in the actual pipeline, with the FAIL line and summary preserved (see PLAN.md §9, Phase 2 hardening).
These cover the tool-output lever only, on selected inputs. They are not a session-wide claim.
Hypothesized (illustrative model, not measured)
To reason about the blended win we model a "typical" medium debugging session. These percentages are an engineering hypothesis to be validated by the Tier B benchmark — not results.
Baseline budget of an illustrative session, by channel:
pie showData
title Baseline session token budget (illustrative)
"Tool output" : 45
"Conversation history" : 15
"Model output" : 15
"Thinking" : 15
"Instructions (fixed)" : 10
Applying a conservative per-lever reduction to each channel:
| Lever | Channel share | Assumed reduction of channel | Saved (% of total) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool-output reduction | 45% | 65% | 29.3% |
| Thinking routing | 15% | 50% | 7.5% |
| Model-output discipline | 15% | 40% | 6.0% |
| Progressive disclosure | 10% | 50% | 5.0% |
| Subtask isolation | 15% | 30% | 4.5% |
| Blended | ≈ 52% |
xychart-beta
title "Hypothesized token savings by lever (% of total session budget)"
x-axis ["Tool output", "Thinking", "Model output", "Instructions", "Subtask iso."]
y-axis "Saved % of total" 0 --> 35
bar [29.3, 7.5, 6.0, 5.0, 4.5]
Scenario range (blended reduction of total session tokens):
| Scenario | Assumptions | Blended reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative | low per-lever rates, tool output only partially matched | ~30% |
| Expected | the table above | ~50% |
| Optimistic | noisy debugging session, high tool-output share | ~65% |
xychart-beta
title "Blended session reduction — hypothesized scenarios (% of total tokens)"
x-axis ["Conservative", "Expected", "Optimistic"]
y-axis "Reduction %" 0 --> 70
bar [30, 50, 65]
Why the model is plausible but unproven: the tool-output lever (the largest slice) is already backed by the measured −65%/−91.2% numbers above. The other levers are extrapolated from vendor documentation on reasoning-token billing, prompt caching, and progressive disclosure. The Tier B end-to-end benchmark (planned) will replace this section's hypotheses with measured, quality-checked numbers comparing vanilla harness vs harness + HarnessTrim.
Status
Phases 0–4 in progress. Shipped: reducers + benchmark, the 6-skill pack, adapters for OpenCode
(runtime plugin, hardened in a live session), Codex (skills + AGENTS.md reduce-pipe, live-validated
via codex debug prompt-input), Claude Code (PostToolUse reducer hook), Hermes Agent
(transform_tool_result plugin, verified in a live session), and Pi (tool_result extension),
plus an MCP reduce server, the harnesstrim CLI (doctor / install / preset / metrics / reduce /
hook / mcp / bench), telemetry, and policy presets. All five target harnesses now have an adapter.
An end-to-end Tier B run on OpenCode confirmed the reducer cuts freshly-billed tool-output tokens
~60% without busting the prompt cache or breaking the task; broader multi-task Tier B runs are the
main remaining work. 83 tests passing, typecheck clean on all packages.
Layout
packages/core/ deterministic, idempotent reducers + content dispatcher + presets + metrics
packages/adapter-opencode/ OpenCode plugin: slims tool output + injects compaction handoff + telemetry
packages/adapter-codex/ Codex: skill bundle + AGENTS.md reduce-pipe instruction
packages/adapter-claude/ Claude Code: PostToolUse reducer hook + skill bundle
packages/adapter-hermes/ Hermes Agent: transform_tool_result reducer plugin (Python)
packages/adapter-pi/ Pi: tool_result reducer extension (TypeScript)
packages/mcp/ MCP server exposing a `reduce` tool (Codex, Claude Code, any MCP client)
packages/cli/ harnesstrim CLI: doctor, install, preset, metrics, reduce, hook, mcp, bench
skills/ portable Agent Skills (delta-response, debug-log-slim, review-delta,
compact-handoff, scaffold-fast, delegate-bulk)
benchmarks/ Tier A micro-benchmarks: reducer token-reduction, no LLM involved
examples/opencode/ minimal opencode.json wiring the adapter (dry-run)
CLI
pnpm exec harnesstrim doctor [dir] # diagnose token-waste signals in a project
pnpm exec harnesstrim install opencode [dir] # OpenCode plugin -> opencode.json (dry-run)
pnpm exec harnesstrim install opencode --preset lean-debug --apply
pnpm exec harnesstrim install codex [dir] # Codex: skills + AGENTS.md reduce-pipe (dry-run)
pnpm exec harnesstrim install claude [dir] # Claude Code: skills + PostToolUse hook (dry-run)
pnpm exec harnesstrim install hermes [dir] # Hermes Agent: transform_tool_result plugin (dry-run)
pnpm exec harnesstrim install pi [dir] # Pi: tool_result extension (dry-run)
pnpm exec harnesstrim install hermes [dir] # Hermes Agent: transform_tool_result plugin (dry-run)
pnpm exec harnesstrim preset list # list policy presets
pnpm exec harnesstrim metrics [path] # summarize adapter telemetry (JSONL)
npm test 2>&1 | pnpm exec harnesstrim reduce # pipe: slim noisy output (Codex/shell)
pnpm exec harnesstrim bench # run the Tier A reducer micro-benchmark
doctorflags oversized always-loaded instruction files (CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/...), reports whether on-demand skills are used, and whether the OpenCode adapter is wired in.install <harness>is dry-run until--apply. Each adapter uses that harness's native surface: OpenCode atool.execute.afterplugin, Claude Code aPostToolUsehook, Hermes atransform_tool_resultplugin, Pi atool_resultextension, Codex an AGENTS.md reduce-pipe instruction.--preset(OpenCode) bakes a policy preset's adapter config in.reduceis the pipe-friendly reducer (RTK-style) shared across harnesses.metricsaggregates the telemetry the adapter emits (off by default) into chars saved per reducer.
Try it
pnpm install
pnpm run test # unit tests (core reducers + dispatcher + adapter hooks)
pnpm run typecheck # type-check every package against real dependency types
pnpm run bench # Tier A micro-benchmark: token reduction on fixed fixtures
Using it in your harness
Each harness has a one-command installer (dry-run until --apply). First make the harnesstrim
command available — until the package is published, either prefix commands with pnpm exec from this
repo, or link it once:
pnpm install
pnpm --filter @harnesstrim/cli link --global # exposes `harnesstrim` on PATH
The installer is a preview until you pass --apply: run it without --apply first to see exactly
what files it would change. That is separate from each adapter's runtime reduction mode below.
Reduction mode & telemetry (per adapter)
Once installed, does the adapter actually slim output, and does it record metrics? This differs by harness. "dry-run mode" here means the adapter logs what it would slim without changing anything.
| Harness | Reduces after install? | Make reduction permanent | Telemetry (metrics) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenCode | Yes — plugin mode defaults to active | already permanent in opencode.json; set "mode": "dryrun" there to only preview | off; set plugin option "telemetry": true (+ optional telemetryPath), read with harnesstrim metrics <path> |
| Claude Code | Yes — the PostToolUse hook reduces once loaded (no dry-run mode) | permanent once in .claude/settings.json | none (the hook does not emit metrics) |
| Codex | No automatic reduction — the model pipes through harnesstrim reduce or calls the MCP reduce tool | permanent (the AGENTS.md instruction / MCP registration persists) | via the MCP/pipe path, not an adapter emitter |
| Hermes | No — starts in dryrun | set HARNESSTRIM_MODE=active persistently (your shell profile or Hermes' service environment, not a one-off export) | off; HARNESSTRIM_TELEMETRY=1 writes ~/.hermes/harnesstrim-metrics.jsonl, read with harnesstrim metrics ~/.hermes/harnesstrim-metrics.jsonl |
| Pi | No — starts in dryrun | set HARNESSTRIM_MODE=active persistently in Pi's environment | none yet (the extension only reduces) |
Guidance: for the dry-run adapters (Hermes, Pi) keep the default while you confirm it slims the right
things (watch stderr for [harnesstrim] dryrun ... lines), then flip to active persistently.
Telemetry is off by default everywhere; enable it only where you want a metrics trail.
OpenCode
harnesstrim install opencode /path/to/project --apply
Wires the plugin into opencode.json. It reduces tool output automatically via tool.execute.after,
no per-command action needed. The plugin defaults to "mode": "active" (reduces immediately); set
"mode": "dryrun" in the plugin options first if you want to preview before enabling. Details:
packages/adapter-opencode,
example: examples/opencode.
Codex
harnesstrim install codex /path/to/project --apply
Copies the skill pack into .codex/skills and adds a reduce-pipe instruction to AGENTS.md. The
agent then slims noisy output by piping it (pytest 2>&1 | harnesstrim reduce), so harnesstrim
must be on PATH. For a first-class, native tool instead of a shell pipe, register the MCP reducer:
codex mcp add harnesstrim -- harnesstrim mcp
Details: packages/adapter-codex,
packages/mcp.
Claude Code
harnesstrim install claude /path/to/project --apply
Copies the skill pack into .claude/skills and adds a PostToolUse hook (matched to Bash) to
.claude/settings.json. The hook runs harnesstrim hook claude, so harnesstrim must be on PATH;
reload Claude Code so the hook loads. It then slims noisy Bash output automatically before the model
sees it. Details: packages/adapter-claude.
Hermes Agent
harnesstrim install hermes --apply # ~/.hermes/plugins/harnesstrim/
harnesstrim install hermes /path/to/project --apply # project-local .hermes/plugins/
Copies a Python plugin that hooks Hermes' transform_tool_result and slims terminal output before
it enters context (it shells out to harnesstrim reduce, so harnesstrim must be on PATH). After
installing, enable it in ~/.hermes/config.yaml:
plugins:
enabled:
- harnesstrim
Restart Hermes. It starts in dryrun (logs to stderr what it would slim); set
HARNESSTRIM_MODE=active in Hermes' environment to actually reduce. Details:
packages/adapter-hermes.
Pi
harnesstrim install pi --apply # <project>/.pi/extensions/harnesstrim/
harnesstrim install pi ~ --apply # global: ~/.pi/... (pass your home dir)
Copies a TypeScript extension that hooks Pi's tool_result and slims noisy output via
harnesstrim reduce (so harnesstrim must be on PATH). It starts in dryrun; set
HARNESSTRIM_MODE=active in Pi's environment to reduce. Details:
packages/adapter-pi.
Any MCP-capable harness
harnesstrim mcp starts a stdio MCP server exposing a reduce tool. Register it with any client that
speaks MCP (Codex, Claude Code, …). See packages/mcp.
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
// faq
What is HarnessTrim?
One token policy for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent and Pi. A cross-harness token-economy control plane.. It is open-source on GitHub.
Is HarnessTrim free to use?
HarnessTrim is open-source under the MIT license, so it is free to use.
What category does HarnessTrim belong to?
HarnessTrim is listed under mcp-servers in the Claudeers registry of Claude-compatible tools.
// embed badge
[](https://claudeers.com/harnesstrim)
// retro hit counter
[](https://claudeers.com/harnesstrim)
// reviews
// guestbook
// related in MCP Servers
f.k.a. Awesome ChatGPT Prompts. Share, discover, and collect prompts from the community. Free and open source — self-host for your organization with complete…
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io
An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
🪨 why use many token when few token do trick — Claude Code skill that cuts 65% of tokens by talking like caveman