metaharness vs FLUJO: mcp-servers for Claude compared
data as of 2026-10-07
1.3k
combined stars
177
combined forks
13
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
metaharness has more GitHub stars (686 vs 640).
FLUJO was updated more recently (2 months ago vs 3 months ago).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
metaharness
★ 686active
🛠️ The meta-harness for AI agents — scaffold your own focused, branded agent harness with its own npx CLI, MCP server, memory, learning loop, and witness-si…
claudeagent-harnessagent-harness-generatoragent-scaffoldingagentic-ai
view full listing →
FLUJO
★ 640active
Multi-Agent + Automation: Workflows, Automation, Self-Improving Agents
claudeagentic-aiagentic-frameworkagentic-workflowai-chat
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | metaharness | FLUJO |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 686 | 640 |
| Forks | 86 | 91 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | active | active |
| Last updated | 3 months ago | 2 months ago |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | cli, api, desktop, web | cli, api, desktop, web |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 13 | 0 |
More: all mcp-servers for Claude compared · the mcp-servers for Claude category
Own metaharness or FLUJO?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.