swarmclaw vs flowcraft: automation for Claude compared
data as of 2026-10-07
1.1k
combined stars
149
combined forks
3
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
swarmclaw has more GitHub stars (689 vs 416).
swarmclaw was updated more recently (3 months ago vs 4 months ago).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
swarmclaw
★ 689slowing
Open-source self-hosted AI agent runtime and multi-agent framework for autonomous agent swarms. Agent memory, MCP tools, schedules, delegation, and 23+ LLM p…
claudeagent-frameworkagent-memoryagent-runtimeagent-swarm
view full listing →
flowcraft
★ 416active
Production-grade Go SDK for building AI agents with long-term memory, knowledge retrieval, and voice — runnable as a library, a daemon, or a real-time pipeline.
claudeagent-frameworkagent-runtimeagentsai
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | swarmclaw | flowcraft |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 689 | 416 |
| Forks | 140 | 9 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | slowing | active |
| Last updated | 3 months ago | 4 months ago |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | cli, api, desktop, web, mobile | cli, api |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 0 | 3 |
More: all automation for Claude compared · the automation for Claude category
Own swarmclaw or flowcraft?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.