swarmclaw vs flowcraft: automation for Claude compared
data as of 2026-08-23
1.1k
combined stars
144
combined forks
3
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
swarmclaw has more GitHub stars (649 vs 415).
swarmclaw was updated more recently (1 month ago vs 2 months ago).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
swarmclaw
★ 649slowing
Open-source self-hosted AI agent runtime and multi-agent framework for autonomous agent swarms. Agent memory, MCP tools, schedules, delegation, and 23+ LLM p…
claudeagent-frameworkagent-memoryagent-runtimeagent-swarm
view full listing →
flowcraft
★ 415active
Production-grade Go SDK for building AI agents with long-term memory, knowledge retrieval, and voice — runnable as a library, a daemon, or a real-time pipeline.
claudeagent-frameworkagent-runtimeagentsai
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | swarmclaw | flowcraft |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 649 | 415 |
| Forks | 135 | 9 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | slowing | active |
| Last updated | 1 month ago | 2 months ago |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | cli, api, desktop, web, mobile | cli, api |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 0 | 3 |
More: all automation for Claude compared · the automation for Claude category
Own swarmclaw or flowcraft?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.