archestra vs fast-agent: mcp-servers for Claude compared
data as of 2026-10-07
8.2k
combined stars
1.7k
combined forks
0
ecosystem connections
100%
open-source
// summary
archestra has more GitHub stars (4.3k vs 3.9k).
The right choice depends on your use case — the full spec is below.
archestra
★ 4.3kactive
Enterprise AI Platform with guardrails, MCP registry, gateway & orchestrator
claudea2aa2a-mcpacpagent
view full listing →
fast-agent
★ 3.9kactive
Code, Build and Evaluate agents - excellent Model and Skills/MCP/ACP/A2A Support
claudea2aacpagentagent-framework
view full listing →// head to head
| spec | archestra | fast-agent |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 4.3k | 3.9k |
| Forks | 1.2k | 445 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Health | active | active |
| Last updated | 3 months ago | 3 months ago |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| License | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Pricing | open-source | open-source |
| Platforms | api | cli, api, web |
| AI compatibility | claude | claude |
| Verified | no | no |
| Ecosystem connections | 0 | 0 |
// related comparisons
More: all mcp-servers for Claude compared · the mcp-servers for Claude category
Own archestra or fast-agent?
Claim your listing to keep its page accurate and earn CC.